Bronchoscopy Practice in Turkey: A Questionnaire StudyErgun Tozkoparan1, Benan Çağlayan2, Levent Dalar3, Semra Bilaçeroğlu4, Ahmet Ilgazlı51Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Gülhane Military Medical Academy, Ankara 2Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Dr. Lütfi Kırdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul 3Department of Pulmonary Medicine, İstanbul Bilim University Faulty of Medicine, İstanbul 4Department Of Pulmonary Diseases, Dr. Suat Seren Pulmonary Diseases And Thoracic Surgery Education And Research Hospital, Izmir 5Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Kocaeli University Faculty of Medicine, İzmit
Objective: As in the rest of the world, there are differences in attitudes and behaviours among physicians in bronchoscopy applications in our country as well. The aim of this study was to put forward the attitudes and behaviours of bronchoscopists using a questionnaire as the Working Group of Interventional Pulmonology of Turkish Respiratory Society. Methods: The invitation letter prepared individuals for participation in the web-based questionnaire containing 23 questions on the implementation of diagnostic and interventional bronchoscopy; the link to the questionnaire was sent to the e-mail groups of pulmonologists, thoracic surgeons and anesthesia and intensive care specialists. The responses of the physicians participating to the questionnaire were evaluated. The results obtained from the questionnaire were evaluated generally and on the basis of medical branches by statistical analyses. Results: The questionnaire was answered by a total of 146 specialists including 93 pulmonologists, 30 thoracic surgeons and 23 anesthesiologists. In total, 73% of the physicians responding to the questionnaire were working at the University or Training and Research Hospital and 47% of the respondents were conducting more than 100 bronchoscopies per year. Here, 36% of the respondents stated that in the bronchoscopies that they carried out, they did not sedate their patients. On the other hand, the most commonly preferred medication for sedation was midazolam (78%). While 77% of the pulmonologists used nebulised lidocaine as a topical anesthetic, these rates were 12.5% and 8.3% respectively for thoracic surgeons and anaesthesiologists (p<0.001). Also, 38% of pulmonologists were conducting 23% of the diagnostic bronchoscopies under general anesthesia. During bronchoscopy, the pulse oximetry follow-up was found to be 97%, and the supplemental oxygen administration was 87%. Overall, 60% of the pulmonologists thought that at least 100 procedures must be performed under the supervision of a specialist during bronchoscopy training and 40% of them were of the opinion that the number of procedures undertaken must be at least 50. Conclusion: The data of the survey give information about the practice of bronchoscopy in Turkey. It is suggested that the repetition of such questionnaires by increasing the variety of questions and the number of participants will provide an important data source. Keywords: Bronchoscopic procedures, questionnaries, guideline
Ergun Tozkoparan, Benan Çağlayan, Levent Dalar, Semra Bilaçeroğlu, Ahmet Ilgazlı. Bronchoscopy Practice in Turkey: A Questionnaire Study. Eurasian J Pulmonol. 2014; 16(2): 110-117
Corresponding Author: Ergun Tozkoparan, Türkiye |
|